Pick states to compare
Select 2–4 states from the dropdowns. The table updates to show side-by-side QAP characteristics.
Source: state HFA published 2026 QAPs (CA TCAC, NY HCR, TX TDHCA, FL FHFC, IL IHDA, OH OHFA, GA DCA, NC NCHFA, PA PHFA, MA EOHLC). Per-capita allocations per IRS Rev. Proc. 2025-32. Verify against the current QAP at the state agency before relying on this for an allocation strategy.
How to use this
Deal sponsors often consider multiple states when siting a project — especially for portfolio LIHTC sponsors. This tool surfaces the structural differences between QAPs that matter for allocation strategy:
- Per-capita allocation: Larger states get more credit dollars. CA, TX, FL, NY, IL are the five largest LIHTC states by volume.
- Set-asides: What percentage is carved out for nonprofits (federal min 10%), rural areas, supportive housing, USDA RHS projects, etc.
- Scoring priorities: Each state's QAP scoring categories — high-priority categories (e.g., proximity to transit, served population) get bigger point allocations.
- Application deadlines: When the 2026 round opens, full application due, and credit reservation announcement.
QAP data shown is a summary snapshot. State QAPs are 100–300 page documents with annual updates. This tool covers the headline differences; for actual underwriting/scoring you must work from the current full QAP PDF and any errata published by the state HFA.